Posts Tagged ‘racism’

The whole history of the progress of human liberty shows that all concessions yet made to her august claims have been born of earnest struggle. … If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet deprecate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what any people will submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.

Fredrick Douglas (1857) [1]

Here’s some of his best:

This apologetic rhetoric has been used almost unchanged from the end of the eugenics era and the World Wars. We’ve heard it all before in several languages and it’s always used to reassert white supremacy without resorting to traditional racist discourse.
Here’s an example of the basic argument over 2/3 of white Americans seem to espouse… Though they don’t openly admit it of course:
“We have nothing against blacks/jews/Arabs if only they were less violent/greedy/angry and didn’t want to sleep with our women”

Sanford Trayvon March 7.20.13

Posted: 2013/07/23 by Punkonomics (@dearbalak) in Announcements
Tags: , , , ,

Don’t miss our recent guest Coy Jones (from 1199SEIU) agitating towards the end!

Most of the discussion related to the Zimmerman case profoundly depresses me, and I’ll be honest with y’all that many of the responses depress me even more.

Like it or not, here’s a short clip from Glenn Ford (Black Agenda Report executive editor) on theRealNews.com explaining things better than I could–I wholeheartedly agree with him.